|
|
 |
|
THE CASE AGAINST
DENSITY-BASED FINGERPRINTING
|
 |
|
Many of the "fingerprints"
created for flexo presses are density-based; i.e., the customer
prints a testplate with step scales for CMYK and sometimes
spot colors. From the printed results, "cutbacks are derived
so that work can be developed and compensated to allow for
the gains typical of flexographic printing. Using this workflow,
proofs are generally "pushed" or run without compensation,
in hopes of simulating the printed results. These proofs
don't offer good color matching for the following reasons:
|
 |
- They don't compensate for the
substrate used
- They don't accurately show the
precise color of the ink used
- The gains measured and applied
are often poorly derived
- Ink overprinting (trapping)
is not accounted for Highlight "break" is not revealed
in the proof
|
|
Mark/Trèce
has committed to offering its customers with the most precise
press characterization and proof prediction technology available.
Developed specifically for the requirements of flexographic
printing the DuPont Color Management System pairs a super-wide
gamat injet printer with the precision of LAB-based color
management. The results are proofs which match your printed
piece with amazing accuracy. Teamed with our PCC Spot Color
matching support and InkSwap technology, we can offer digital
proofs that your press can match without hours of make ready
and worse, plate remakes.
Finally, this press
characterization workflow allows us to open your color management
to the desktop, offering color control from scanning, through
editing and softproofing, across monitors and platforms.
|
 |
|
LAB COLOR SPACE
|
 |
|
LAB color differs
from density-based press characterization in that the actual
colors of the inks used are measured and recorded for your
press. Those colors are measured as they appear on the substrate
used, as well as how they print when printed with other
colors. Our testplate is a target of over 1800 color spots,
enabling us to build a precise map of the actual color gamut
which your press can reproduce. Once characterized, our
proofer will restrict its output to the gamut of your press,
assuring that no colors on the proof will be outside of
your capabilities.
|
 |
|
EXTENDING YOUR
COLOR MANAGEMENT CAPABILITIES
|
 |
|
The press characterization
we offer is further extended by technologies that push the
limits of flexographic printing. Mark/Trèce offers spot
color support, ink swapping technologies, HYBRID SCREENING,
and FLEXOCAL non-linear imagesetter calibration technology.
|
 |
|
SPOT COLOR
SUPPORT:
|
 |
|
We are able to
measure LAB values of any color patch provided and reproduce
that color in your proof. Although our digital proofer is
a cmyk device, you'll find that its gamut produces most
of the colors previously thought unattainable from a process
device.
|
 |
|
INK-SWAP:
|
 |
|
We use PCC InkSwap
to allow us to create modified process proofs without resorting
to guesswork and expensive testruns. This allows your customer
to develop multiple versions of a job in a short time while
a design is still under creative development.
|
 |
|
FLEXOCAL
IMAGESETTER CALIBRATION:
|
 |
|
Cutbacks are a
fact of life in the flexo world, due to the press gains
typical of the process. Just how those cutbacks are applied
makes all the difference in preserving grey levels, preventing
"banding", and achieving full, saturated color reproduction
with the lowest level of gains possible. Let us show you
how our FlexoCal technology creates a smoother, rounder,
more plate-able dot which gains less and can hold down to
a .5% printing dot.
|
 |
|
HYBRID SCREENING:
|
 |
|
The advantages
of FlexoCal are taken one step further with Hybrid Screening
technology. This process combines the proven benefits of
stochastic screening in the highlight range, and transitions
to a smoother, lower-gain conventional dotshape throughout
the rest of the image range. The result is that you'll print
vignettes down to white without harsh breaks, and can control
difficult pastels and other tones which are compromised
by the use of a "necessary" minimum dot.
|